The

ACTS of the APOSTLES

and

AFTERWARDS
by

STUART ALLEN

Author of
The Unfolding Purpose of God

On Reading the Bible

The Interpretation of Scripture

The Early Centuries and the Truth

The Kingdom of God in Heaven & on Earth

The Early and Pastoral Epistles of Paul

The Galatian and Roman epistles of Paul

Letters from Prison
etc., etc.
THE BEREAN PUBLISHING TRUST
52A WILSON STREET,

LONDON, EC2A 2ER, ENGLAND

2 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES AND AFTERWARDS



CONTENTS
Page
Acknowledgement 3

Author's Preface 3

Introduction 4

Chapter One 6

Chapter Two 13

Chapter Three 20

Chapter Four 25

Chapter Five 28

Chapter Six 32

Chapter Seven 34

Chapter Eight 38

Chapter Nine 41

Chapter Ten 46

Chapter Eleven 50

Chapter Twelve 53

Chapter Thirteen 55

Chapter Fourteen 60

Chapter Fifteen 63

Chapter Sixteen 67

Chapter Seventeen 70

Chapter Eighteen 75

Chapter Nineteen 79

Chapter Twenty 84

Chapter Twenty-one 88

Chapter Twenty-two 92

Chapter Twenty-three 94

Chapter Twenty-four 97

Chapter Twenty-five 97

Chapter Twenty-six 102

Chapter Twenty-seven 104

Chapter Twenty-eight 108

Afterwards 115

Indexes

Index to Scriptural references 119

Index to Greek words used 126

Index to Latin words used 126

Index to Structure 126
Note: () should have reference inclosed .

ACTS 6 3




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Scripture taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright ã 1973, 1978, 1984 by



International Bible Society. Used by permission of Hodder & Stoughton Limited.

Except where otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations have been taken from the NEW INTERNATIONAL

VERSION (N.I.V.), as we gratefully acknowledge above. The other versions quoted are:

A.V. Authorized Version

R.V. Revised Version

R.S.V. Revised Standard Version

A.S.V. American Standard Version

Where a Scripture reference contains a word or words printed in italics, this is the author's way of emphasizing



a thought.

AUTHOR'S PREFACE

The Acts of the Apostles is one of the key books of the New Testament. Without it we should be at a loss to

place the epistles, and to trace the purpose of God Who `works out everything in conformity with the purpose of His

will' (Ephesians 1:11). We have therefore given it a verse by verse exposition. It is easy to miss the main object of

this important book and to get side-tracked. But we have tried to avoid this and keep close to Luke's history which

deals with the beginning of Christianity and the development of the purpose of God which can be traced throughout

the Bible and is centred on Christ and His Kingdom. The Gospels deal with what `Jesus began to do and to teach'

concerning this kingdom (Acts 1:1), and are followed by what He continued to do and teach in the Acts through the



work of the Holy Spirit and the instrumentality of Peter and Paul and those associated with them

The author wishes to convey his gratitude to the friends who have assisted so ably in typing, proofing and

making the indexes. May all who read the book come to a knowledge of Him `Whom to know is life eternal', with

endless joy and blessing to follow.

4 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES AND AFTERWARDS



INTRODUCTION.

When it was written, the book we are considering was known as The Acts by early Christian leaders such as

Origen, Tertullian, Eusebius and others. About the middle of the second century it became known as The Acts of the

Apostles. It was part of an account of the history of Christian origins. The first part was known as the Gospel

according to Luke whose author was Luke, `the beloved physician', and at the beginning, these two Volumes almost



certainly circulated as one complete work. Soon, after the publication of the Fourth Gospel, the first part of Luke's

writing was put together with the other three canonical Gospels, forming one Volume, and the second part of Luke's

writing circulated by itself as we have it today.

The story is not really the Acts of the Apostles, for only three of the original twelve apostles appear in the

narrative, namely Peter, James and John, and the latter two are only mentioned. The book of the Acts records the

Acts of the Holy Spirit through Peter and Paul, who continued to do `all that Jesus began both to do and to teach'

(Acts 1:1). Peter is practically dropped from the story after the conversion of Cornelius.

Later, Paul's epistles were collected together and the two collections were known as The Gospel and The Apostle.

There is no doubt that the Acts played a very important part in relating these two volumes or collections; and without



it we should have great difficulty in placing the books of the New Testament, or of understanding the purpose of

God after the resurrection of Christ.

There has been practically universal agreement that Luke was the human author of the third Gospel and the Acts

of the Apostles. As to the purpose of his writing, we need not guess, but read the prologue to his Gospel :

`Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2just




as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eye-witnesses and servants of

the Word. 3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning,

it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so

that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught' (Luke 1:1-4).



He was evidently not an eyewitness of the earlier events recorded in his Gospel, but he certainly had access to

the information which such witnesses could supply. He informs us that many had attempted to give a written record

of what happened at the birth of Christ and afterwards, and we can well understand the difficulties that Christians

had in sorting out all this material when the canon of the New Testament was being formed. We believe that the

superintendence of the Holy Spirit must have worked here so that the completed Word of God did not contain

erroneous matter. This was as much a miracle as the writing of the holy Scriptures.

Luke claims that he made careful and thorough research for the facts contained in his Gospel and that they were

arranged in proper sequence. For the later part of his narrative (the Acts) he could draw on his own experience.

His accuracy as an historian has been clearly and abundantly demonstrated by the research and writings of Sir

William Ramsay. In his early life Ramsay believed that the Acts belonged to the middle of the Second Century

A.D., but as he advanced in his archaeological discoveries in Asia Minor, this, together with his wide and accurate

knowledge of the life of the Roman Empire, led him to conclude that it must have been written in the First Century

with full knowledge.

One of the most impressive facts which proves Luke's accuracy is related to the titles of the various officials in

the Roman Empire which he mentions in his writings. The titles of provincial governors changed suddenly if the

status of provinces was changed, but Luke never makes a mistake here. He was absolutely trustworthy in all the

points where he can be checked, and this being so we should not assume that he is less reliable where we cannot test

his accuracy.

Luke has been criticised on the ground of real or fancied disagreement with Josephus. But Josephus is not more

distinguished for accuracy, and where they disagree Luke is as likely to be right as Josephus.

ACTS 6 5



There can be no doubt that Luke was an exceptional man. Dr Plummer describes him as `the most versatile of

all the New Testament writers'. He was at once a medical doctor, a poet, a traveller, a missionary, a devoted friend,

a great and reliable historian, and a great Christian.

DATE. While some scholars advocate a late date, others give good reason for an earlier date. This is discussed in

the author's introduction to the Gospel of Luke. Professors F.F.Bruce and A.T.Robertson and others give A.D.61-63

as a more likely date. It was possible for Luke to have written both volumes towards the end of the two years of

Paul's imprisonment at Rome (Acts 28:30).

It is not easy to say in a few words what Luke's object was in writing this book. It is not the Acts of all the



apostles. Apart from Peter and John, little is told of any of them after chapter three. Peter himself disappears from

the narrative after chapter fifteen. Paul is not one of the twelve apostles, although some think he ought to be

numbered amongst them. He dominates the atmosphere of the Acts from chapter nine onwards.

It should be noticed that Luke's Gospel stresses the importance of the Gentile, who is seen in a favourable light,

while the Acts gives us a careful account of the spread of God's truth over the Gentile world with Israel's opposition

to it all. It is a summing up of some forty years after the crucifixion, showing how Israel failed again in the purpose

of God, how the Gentile responded, and finally the laying aside of the chosen nation, in blindness and unbelief, who

had dominated the scene, by God's appointment, since the time of Jacob.

This ended the possibility of the setting up at that time of the Messianic Kingdom foreshadowed in the Old

Testament. To miss this is to miss one of the main reasons for the writing of the Acts of the Apostles. The Gospels

inform us of what the Lord Jesus said and did in His ministry to Israel. His own words assure us that He was `sent

only to the lost sheep of Israel' (Matt 15:24) and He confined the ministry of the apostles to Israel, the chosen nation,

avoiding any contact with the Gentiles (Matt. 10:5-8).

This is inexplicable unless the earthly kingdom of the Old Testament is in view. Not that Gentiles were to be

permanently excluded, for that kingdom finally embraces the whole earth when the knowledge of the Lord shall

cover the earth `as the waters cover the sea' (Isa. 11:9) and the Lord Jesus will become more than the King of Israel,

namely the `King over all the earth' (Zech. 14:9 A.V.) and then will the plan of God revealed to Abraham come to



pass, that his seed should be a blessing to `all families of the earth' (Gen. 12:1-3 A.V.).

If the Gospels record the acts and sayings of the Lord Jesus, then the Acts continue the theme by the power and

guidance of the Holy Spirit, so much so that many feel that a more fitting title for Luke's book would be the `Acts of

the Holy Spirit'.

6 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES AND AFTERWARDS



CHAPTER ONE
`In my former book, Theophilus, I wrote about all that Jesus began to do and to teach 2until the day he



was taken up to heaven, after giving instructions through the Holy Spirit to the apostles He had
chosen. 3After His suffering, He showed Himself to these men and gave many convincing proofs



that He was alive. He appeared to them over a period of forty days and spoke about the kingdom
of God. 4On one occasion, while He was eating with them, He gave them this command: "Do not



leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift My Father promised, which you have heard Me speak
about. 5For John baptised with water, but in a few days you will be baptised with the Holy

Spirit."' (Acts 1:1-5).



Luke commences by referring to his former book, namely the third Gospel, and the last verses of the Gospel

overlap the opening verses of the Acts (Luke 24:36-53; Acts 1:1-14). A general comparison of these two

portions of Scripture would take a great deal of space, so we use the admirable summing up of C.H.Welch* :



(A.V.) (A.V.)

Many infallible proofs.
`And as they thus spake,

Jesus Himself stood in the

midst of them and saith

unto them, "Peace be unto

you". But they were

terrified and affrighted, and

supposed that they had seen

a spirit. And He said unto

them, "Why are ye

troubled? and why do

thoughts arise in your

hearts? Behold My hands

and My feet, that it is I

Myself; handle Me and see;

for a spirit hath not flesh

and bones, as ye see Me

have". And when He had

thus spoken He showed them

His hands and His feet. And

while they yet believed not

for joy, and wondered, He

said unto them, "Have ye

here any meat?" And they

gave Him a piece of broiled

fish, and of an honeycomb,

and He took it and did eat

before them'.

` ... the apostles whom

He had chosen: to whom

also He showed Himself

alive after His passion by

many infallible proofs,

being seen of them forty

days'.

(It will be seen that what




Luke wrote in fuller detail,

Acts summarizes under one

head. This is exactly what

we do when referring to

previous correspondence on

any subject).

*See The Apostle of the Reconciliation, obtainable from The Berean Publishing Trust.

ACTS 6 7




before them'.
The Lord's words to His apostles
`And He said unto them,

"These are the words that I

spake unto you while I was

yet with you; that all things

must be fulfilled which were

written in the Law of Moses,

and in the Prophets, and in
the Psalms, concerning Me.




Then opened He their

understanding that they

might understand the
Scriptures"'.



`Speaking of the things

pertaining to the kingdom of

God'.

(Notice how these two




aspects of truth are brought

together in the last verse of

Acts `preaching the

KINGDOM OF GOD, and



teaching those things which

concern the LORD JESUS

CHRIST' - an unobtrusive




connection such as delighted

Paley.* Further, the fact of




their opened understanding

shows their question in to be

right and fitting, as also ).



The Commission
`Repentance and

remission of sins should be

preached in His name

among all nations, beginning

at Jerusalem and ye are

witnesses of these things'.

`Ye shall be witnesses

unto Me both in Jerusalem

and in all Judaea, and in

Samaria, and unto the

uttermost part of the

earth'.
The Enduement
`Behold, I send the

promise of My Father upon

you; but tarry ye in the city

of Jerusalem until ye be

endued with power from on

high'.

`Commanded them that

they should not depart

from Jerusalem, but wait

for the promise of the

Father, which, saith He, ye

have heard of Me ... Ye

shall be baptised with the

Holy Spirit not many days

hence ... Ye shall receive

power, after that the Holy

Spirit is come upon you'.

*W.Paley was a great Christian philosopher (1743-1805) whose books are still valued today.

8 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES AND AFTERWARDS



The Ascension
`And it came to pass

while He blessed them, He

was parted from them, and

carried up into heaven'.

`And when He had

spoken these things, while

they beheld, He was taken

up; and a cloud received

Him out of their sight'.

(Notice how each




supplements the other. The

Gospel tells us `He was

parted from them' but does

not say how. Acts adds the

information concerning `the

cloud'. Acts also adds

statements regarding the

angels and the second

coming of the Lord).



The Apostles' return
`And they worshipped

Him and returned to

Jerusalem with great joy;

and were continually in the

Temple praising and

blessing God'.

`And they returned unto

Jerusalem from the Mount

called Olivet, which is from

Jerusalem a sabbath day's

journey. And when they

were come in, they went up

into an upper room ....

These all continued with

one accord in prayer and

supplication'.
- o - o - o - o - o - o -
Surely the most wonderful experience the apostles ever enjoyed was to have the inestimable privilege of hearing

the Lord Jesus interpret the written Word! The greatest and absolutely infallible Teacher expounds the Word of God

and that for over a month! It could be said that although this was true, the apostles, being human and fallible, might

have failed to understand what He taught. Luke, at the close of his Gospel, shows that this was not so. He quotes

the Lord Jesus as saying :
`44"This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written



about Me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."

45Then He opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.' ().



And so, not only did they hear the greatest Teacher interpret the Old Testament, but they clearly understood what He

said, because He gave them that understanding!

As a result of this wonderful teaching, they asked Him a question, and this was not likely to be a foolish one,



when their minds had been enlightened.

ACTS 6 9


`So when they met together, they asked him, "Lord, are you at this time going to restore the

kingdom to Israel?"' ().



Now it is here that expositors can make their own stumbling block. They assume that the apostles, in using the

word `kingdom', meant just a vast political power and nothing more. The point at issue is this, the kingdom that the

apostles mentioned and the one which the Lord explained to them was the Messianic kingdom of the Old Testament.



This cannot be gainsaid. So we ask the question, is this kingdom just a political one bolstered up with great power,

or is it a spiritual one? To answer this in detail would require a large volume, for the Old Testament is so rich in its

description of this kingdom. But we can settle the question by noting what was the purpose of God in choosing

(electing) Israel. We shall have then the very centre of God's plan for His kingdom on this earth.

Let us turn to . God said to Moses :
`3 ... "This is what you are to say to the house of Jacob and what you are to tell the people of

Israel: 4`You yourselves have seen what I did to Egypt, and how I carried you on eagles' wings

and brought you to Myself. 5Now if you obey Me fully and keep My covenant, then out of all

nations you will be My treasured possession. Although the whole earth is Mine, 6you will be for

Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation'. These are the words you are to speak to the



Israelites."'
Later on,
 

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Yeshua cumple con las Fiestas de Primavera

El Racimo de uvas de Escol

POR ENCIMA DE LOS CIELOS